Get in Line: Chapter 11 Restructuring in Crowded Bankruptcy Courts APPENDIX

نویسنده

  • Benjamin Iverson
چکیده

In the text, I argue that dismissal from court is equivalent to liquidation for most firms. To verify this, I randomly selected 100 dismissed firms that filed for Chapter 11 and examined the reasons for their dismissal using court documents on the U.S. Court's Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system. In general, the reasons for dismissal can be sorted into four categories: (1) the debtor failed to follow court procedure, such as failure to file specific documents, failure to hire counsel, or failure to show up in court; (2) the debtor is deemed to have abused the system by filing in bad faith, or filing repeatedly without making efforts to repay its debts; (3) there is no possibility that the debtor can successfully reorganize; (4) the debtor has reached a settlement with its creditors and therefore no longer needs bankruptcy protection. Unsurprisingly, the reason for dismissal varies considerably depending on which party files the motion. When the trustee or court files the motion for dismissal, it is typically because the debtor did not obey a court order of some sort, but in a significant minority of cases it is also because there is no hope of reorganization. When a creditor files a successful motion the reason for dismissal is often because the debtor has abused the bankruptcy system in some way. Debtor-filed motions, however, are nearly equally split between debtors who have no hope of reorganizing, and who wish to leave bankruptcy and simply liquidate without incurring further legal fees, and debtors who have either found a buyer or have reached a settlement with their creditors. It should be noted that in many cases when a debtor sees no hope of reorganization and files for dismissal of the case the court has previously granted motions in favor of the creditors, such as lifting the automatic stay or denying the use

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Get in Line: Chapter 11 Restructuring in Crowded Bankruptcy Courts

This paper tests whether Chapter 11 restructuring outcomes are affected by time constraints in busy bankruptcy courts. On average, total bankruptcy filings rise by 32% during economic recessions, leaving bankruptcy judges with far less time per case exactly when financial distress is worst. Using the passage of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA) in 2005 as an e...

متن کامل

The Choice Among Traditional Chapter 11, Prepackaged Bankruptcy,and Out-of-Court Restructuring

I examine how financially distressed firms choose among three alternatives: traditional Chapter 11 bankruptcy, prepackaged bankruptcy, and out-of-court restructuring. In doing so, I investigate firm performance and capital structure, as well as the previously undocumented role of managerial discretion. My sample consists of 198 observations and 174 poorly performing firms that start restructuri...

متن کامل

Deliberation and Security Design in Bankruptcy

We consider a bargaining game among the claimants of a bankrupt firm in which claimants have private information about various operational restructuring alternatives, and can communicate prior to an offer. Our setup differs from typical bargaining games with incomplete information in two ways. First, the proposals can be made using securities. Second, the negotiations are over two interdependen...

متن کامل

The Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Debt Restructuring and Voting Rules

The voting arrangements used by creditors during debt restructuring are prespecified, often by statute. For example, U.S. law stipulates unanimous agreement outside bankruptcy, but allows for a supermajority vote in Chapter 11 bankruptcy. We analyze the effect of voting rules on the welfare of debtors and their creditors in restructuring negotiations. When markets are liquid, the “toughness” en...

متن کامل

Bankruptcy proceedings for sovereign state

The paper examines the main issues involved in translating domestic bankruptcy procedures to the sovereign context. It considers some of the principles by which domestic bankruptcy procedures operate, and the extent to which they apply to international lending. Two recent proposals are considered in more detail, that of Krueger (A New Approach to Sovereign Debt Restructuring) and that of Pettif...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012